Introduction to VARA

Virtual assets have gained significant demand due to several factors. Firstly, they offer greater accessibility and inclusivity, allowing individuals from different parts of the world to participate in financial activities without the need for traditional intermediaries. Additionally, virtual assets provide the potential for high returns on investment, attracting investors seeking alternative opportunities. The technology behind virtual assets, such as blockchain, provides enhanced security, transparency, and immutability, which further contributes to their appeal.

To safeguard the interests of participants in the virtual asset space, guidelines are essential. These VARA guidelines typically cover areas such as registration and licensing requirements for virtual asset service providers, anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) measures, consumer protection, and cybersecurity protocols. Implementing strong KYC and customer due diligence procedures, ensuring secure storage of assets, and monitoring transactions for suspicious activities are important elements of safeguarding virtual assets. Furthermore, regulations and enforcement mechanisms help to deter fraudulent activities, market manipulation, and ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards. By following these guidelines, regulators aim to protect investors, maintain market integrity, and foster trust in the virtual asset ecosystem.

The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) is a regulatory body created for the purpose of this conversation. Virtual assets, also known as cryptocurrencies or digital currencies, are digital representations of value that can be used as a medium of exchange. They utilize cryptography for security and operate on decentralized networks, such as blockchain technology. Examples of virtual assets include Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. Due to the increasing popularity and adoption of virtual assets, governments and regulatory authorities around the world have recognized the need to develop frameworks to address the regulatory and legal aspects of these assets. Various countries have established their own regulatory bodies or agencies to oversee and regulate virtual assets within their jurisdictions. Typically, these regulatory authorities aim to protect investors, prevent fraudulent activities, ensure compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations, and maintain the stability and integrity of financial systems. They may implement licensing requirements for virtual asset service providers, monitor exchanges, establish guidelines, and enforce regulatory compliance.

While VARA is in UAE, there are several other regulatory bodies that oversee virtual assets. For example, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States, and the Financial Services Agency (FSA) in Japan have all taken steps to regulate virtual assets within their respective jurisdictions. It’s important to note that the regulatory landscape surrounding virtual assets is constantly evolving, and new regulations and regulatory bodies may emerge in the future. It’s crucial for individuals and businesses involved in virtual assets to stay informed about the regulatory requirements in their jurisdiction to ensure compliance and mitigate any potential risks.

Various countries and jurisdictions have taken different approaches to regulate virtual assets and cryptocurrencies. Some have introduced specific legislation, while others have relied on existing financial regulations to cover these assets. Guidelines typically aim to address concerns related to consumer protection, anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorism financing (CTF), and investor safeguards. Common regulatory measures include implementing Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, enforcing AML and CTF requirements, establishing licensing frameworks for virtual asset service providers, and ensuring compliance with tax laws. Additionally, regulatory authorities often monitor initial coin offerings (ICOs) and securities-related activities involving virtual assets.

In the fast-paced world of digital innovation, virtual assets have emerged as a significant component of the global economy. With the rise of cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other digital assets, there is a growing need for regulatory frameworks to ensure transparency, consumer protection, and market stability. One such regulatory authority that has been established to address these concerns is the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). This article aims to provide an introduction to VARA, its role, and the guidelines it sets forth in the realm of virtual assets.

What is VARA?

VARA is a regulatory authority tasked with overseeing and regulating virtual assets within a particular jurisdiction. It operates as an independent agency, separate from traditional financial regulators, and focuses exclusively on the regulation of virtual assets. VARA’s primary objective is to establish a robust framework that promotes innovation, protects investors, and mitigates risks associated with virtual assets.

The Role of VARA-

Developing Guidelines and Regulations:

One of VARA’s main responsibilities is to develop comprehensive guidelines and regulations that govern the operation of virtual assets within its jurisdiction. These guidelines outline the rules and requirements that individuals and entities dealing with virtual assets must adhere to. They cover areas such as registration, licensing, anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) measures, cybersecurity, and consumer protection.

Licensing and Registration:

VARA oversees the licensing and registration of virtual asset service providers (VASPs) operating within its jurisdiction. VASPs include cryptocurrency exchanges, wallet providers, and other entities involved in facilitating the exchange, transfer, or storage of virtual assets. By establishing licensing requirements, VARA ensures that VASPs meet certain standards and comply with relevant regulations, thereby enhancing the integrity and security of virtual asset transactions.

Consumer Protection:

VARA places a strong emphasis on consumer protection in the virtual asset space. It sets guidelines and requirements to ensure that VASPs have proper measures in place to safeguard customer funds and data. These guidelines may include implementing robust security protocols, conducting regular audits, and adhering to strict Know Your Customer (KYC) and customer due diligence procedures. VARA’s efforts aim to instill confidence in consumers and protect them from fraudulent activities and scams.

Market Surveillance and Enforcement:

VARA is responsible for monitoring and surveilling the virtual asset market within its jurisdiction. It has the authority to investigate any suspected misconduct, market manipulation, or fraudulent activities related to virtual assets. VARA’s enforcement powers allow it to impose penalties, fines, or take legal action against individuals or entities found to be in violation of virtual asset regulations. By ensuring market integrity, VARA contributes to the overall stability and trustworthiness of the virtual asset ecosystem.


As virtual assets continue to gain prominence in the global financial landscape, regulatory authorities such as VARA play a crucial role in maintaining market integrity, protecting consumers, and fostering innovation. Through the development of comprehensive guidelines, licensing and registration requirements, and robust enforcement measures, VARA aims to create a transparent and secure environment for virtual asset transactions. By understanding the role of VARA and its guidelines, individuals, and entities operating in the virtual asset space can navigate the regulatory landscape with confidence, contributing to the responsible growth and development of this emerging sector.

Leading GCC Metaverse Hub

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are anticipating billion-dollar metaverse returns.

According to research, the metaverse will provide $15 billion to Gulf economies by 2030, with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates leading the way. Saudi Arabia will lead the way with a $7.6 billion investment, followed by the UAE with $3.3 billion.

Although the metaverse is still in its early stages, change is occurring at a rapid rate. GCC organizations should move quickly and grab this chance. We anticipate that the metaverse will pump $15 billion per year into GCC economies by 2030.

“The forecasts took into account growth in component technologies, platforms, hardware, and software, as well as the economic impact of new metaverse applications like content production, commerce, and so on.”

The metaverse is unique in that it is neither a location nor a technology.

It is, rather, the most recent stage in the evolving human/computer interface, one that is intended to generate a seamless, ubiquitous, immersive, touchable, simulated experience that is so realistic as to mimic reality.

You may, for example, visit a virtual construction site and see how structures will appear before a shovel is ever placed in the ground.

Dubai formally started its metaverse plan in July 2022, with the goal of becoming a dominant metaverse economy. Over the next five years, the initiative is expected to add $4 billion to the economy and create 40,000 new employment. This is a great opportunity for entrepreneurs to start their business in this arena after obtaining a metaverse license and getting in touch with a metaverse start-up consultant.

The UAE has set up the Middle East’s first metaverse incubator 8 to foster the development of early stage metaverse and Web3 apps.

NEOM, Saudi Arabia’s $500 billion Red Sea metropolis, leverages the metaverse to inform building and give architects, engineers, designers, and others with a collaborative and customizable experience. The digital division of NEOM has invented a metaverse that allows individuals to be in both the physical and virtual worlds at the same time, in the form of an avatar or a hologram.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have metaverse ambitions. Beyond next-generation games and internet-based house purchasing or shopping, the metaverse promises an universe of possibilities. It will alter the way we work, do business, plan, design, construct, shop, recreate, travel, and live. In a regional context, the metaverse has immense potential to revitalize and alter important industries in GCC nations.

According to the analysis, travel and tourism have the biggest potential economic gain from the metaverse: an estimated US$3.2 billion. Metaverse excursions to AIUla, Saudi Arabia’s first UNESCO World Heritage Site, or fashion festivals, spas, wellness retreats, and entertainment and sports events are all possibilities. In-person travel would be inspired by metaverse visits. Travelers might later return to the metaverse to repeat their adventures.

Saudi Arabia will benefit the most from the metaverse ($7.6 billion), followed by the UAE ($3.3 billion), Qatar ($1.6 billion), Kuwait ($1 billion), Oman ($0.8 billion), and Bahrain ($0.4 billion).

The FTX Thieves

Mysterious robbers stole hundreds of millions of dollars from FTX just before the company was about to collapse. Blockchain study of cryptocurrency may give a solution.

Cryptocurrency has always provided an interesting mix of temptations and difficulties for those trying to steal it. It is an attractive target since it is digital cash housed in multibillion-dollar quantities on hackable, internet-connected networks. However, once taken, the blockchains on which practically every cryptocurrency is based allow for tracking the money’s every step and, in many cases, identifying the culprits. So, after a massive heist pulled nearly $500 million in funds from the already collapsing FTX cryptocurrency exchange yesterday, the world’s crypto tracers are now closely tracking where that loot ends up—and looking for any clues that reveal the thief was an FTX insider or simply an opportunistic hacker.

FTX’s remaining reserves were drained of more than $663 million in cryptocurrency, much of which appears to have been stolen, hours after the big cryptocurrency exchange filed for bankruptcy in the aftermath of its dramatic, 10-figure collapse. “FTX has been hacked,” an administrator posted on the FTX Telegram channel. “FTX applications are malicious. Remove them.” It’s unclear how FTX was stolen or whether its applications were affected, and the company hasn’t formally reported any theft. However, in a tweet, the company’s US general counsel stated that “unauthorized access to some assets has happened.”

Elliptic, a crypto-tracing and blockchain research service, soon showed that the $663 million outflow appeared to be a mix of FTX’s moving of coins into its own storage wallets and an unknown theft. According to Elliptic, all $477 million of the assets appear to have been taken, however TRM Labs, another cryptocurrency-tracing outfit, estimates the figure at $338 million. Twenty-four hours after the heist, most of the money had been transferred to a handful of cryptocurrency addresses, where the whole crypto-tracing business, a wide community of amateur crypto sleuths, and no doubt law enforcement organizations all over the world are now keeping a close eye.

That observability, for the FTX monies and other stolen crypto stashes, provides a significant obstacle for any crook attempting to pay out their hoard into traditional currency. In this case, where regulators and an army of enraged creditors are looking for any indication that FTX’s employees or owners were the perpetrators, it could eventually help confirm that insiders were responsible for the theft—or show that external hackers took advantage of the chaos at FTX to commit a burglary.

At least $220 million in stolen cash in the form of several cryptocurrencies were immediately converted into the cryptocurrencies ether and dai using decentralized exchanges—trading systems that let users can shift coins without providing identifying information. However, paying out those coins and the remainder of the stolen treasure will almost certainly need exchanging it on a controlled exchange, which nearly usually necessitates users providing identifying information. The criminals may attempt to launder the money by mingling it with coins from other users via a “mixing” service. However, crypto tracing blockchain experts have demonstrated that they can frequently overcome such mixers, especially when consumers pour extremely significant quantities into them.

Meanwhile, many other cryptocurrency enthusiasts have been keeping a close eye on one Ethereum address, which is now holding roughly $192 million in money. The account has been transferring modest amounts of Ethereum-based tokens, some of which appear to be worthless, to a number of exchange accounts, as well as Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin and Ukrainian cryptocurrency fundraiser accounts. However, crypto experts believe that these transactions are more likely intended to confuse law authorities or other observers before any actual attempt to launder or cash out the money.

The theft of FTX, whether it totals $338 million or $477 million, is hardly an unusual haul in the realm of cryptocurrency crime. Cryptocurrencies tracking led to the arrest earlier this year of a New York couple suspected of laundering $4.5 billion in cryptocurrency.

However, in the instance of the high-profile FTX robbery and the exchange’s general demise, tracing the misdirected cash might help lay to rest—or confirm—swirling suspicions that someone within FTX was responsible for the theft. Sam Bankman-Fried, the company’s Bahamas-based CEO who resigned Friday, lost nearly his entire $16 billion fortune in the collapse. According to an unsubstantiated claim, he and two other FTX officials are “under surveillance” in the Bahamas and are not permitted to leave.

As speculation mounts about whether—or to what extent—own FTX’s management was responsible for the theft, the case has begun to resemble, more than any recent crypto heist, a very old one: the theft of a half billion dollars’ worth of bitcoins from Mt. Gox, the first cryptocurrency exchange, discovered in 2014. In that case, blockchain research performed by cryptocurrency tracing startup Chainalysis, in collaboration with law enforcement, assisted in pinning the theft on external hackers rather than Mt. Gox’s own employees. Eventually, in 2017, a Russian man named Alexander Vinnik was caught in Greece and convicted of laundering the stolen Mt. Gox assets, exonerating Mt. Gox’s troubled leaders.

It is unclear whether history will repeat itself and bitcoin tracking will reveal the innocence of FTX’s workers. But, with more eyes than ever scouring the blockchains of the cryptocurrency economy, it’s a safer bet that the mystery behind the FTX heist will be solved sooner or later.

How to generate income in metaverse

In general, the technologies that firms allude to when they talk about “the metaverse” might include virtual reality (defined by persistent virtual environments that exist even when you’re not playing) and augmented reality (which blends features of the digital and physical worlds). It does not, however, necessitate that those areas be accessed solely through VR or AR. Virtual worlds, such as Fortnite elements accessible via PCs, gaming consoles, and even phones, have begun to refer to itself as “the metaverse.”

Many organizations that have jumped on the metaverse bandwagon foresee a new digital economy in which users may produce, purchase, and sell items. In more utopian metaverse ideas, it’s interoperable, enabling you to move virtual objects like clothing or vehicles from one platform to another, however this is more difficult than it seems. While some supporters argue that emerging technologies such as NFTs can enable movable digital assets, this is simply not true. Moving goods from one video game or virtual world to another is an incredibly difficult operation that no one firm can handle.

To engage with youthful consumers, brands are venturing into virtual spaces. But are these digital places simply billboards for corporations, or can they provide real-world benefits?

Whatever it is, retailers are going in headfirst — and plenty of customers are watching.

Companies all over the sector are increasingly staging activations on platforms that are considered to be part of the metaverse. The definition of what the metaverse is (or is supposed to be) varies, but in general, it is a virtually immersive version of the internet. Retailers are studying Roblox, Decentraland, and Sandbox as ways to get into the metaverse, even if they aren’t as interoperable as some would want.

According to its most recent financial report, Roblox has 58.8 million daily active users, a 24% rise from the previous year. The platform is also popular among younger users: According to sources, there were 24.2 million daily active users under the age of 13 in Q2. With that age group expected to acquire purchasing power over the coming decade, it’s no surprise that businesses are attempting to meet them where they are.

Gucci, Walmart, and Gap have all launched Roblox activations ranging from well-designed virtual pop-up storefronts to interactive games. But is the metaverse merely a virtual billboard for corporations, or can it be linked to real-world items and revenue? Here’s a look at how some retailers are utilizing the space to get practical advantages.

‘Consumers continue to place a premium on physical encounters.’

Aside from creating visually appealing activations in the area, businesses have begun to encourage advantages such as real-world clothing collections, discounts, and loyalty bonuses.

Claire’s, an accessories business, debuted ShimmerVille in Roblox last month, with a focus on self-expression through virtual goods that are also available in its physical locations. In June, Victoria’s Secret’s young sub-brand Happy Nation teamed with Roblox to establish a virtual obstacle course where users could donate genuine pairs of underwear from the company to Undies for Everyone while also viewing the newest capsule collection.

Consider how you had to test things in the past. The only true method to evaluate the features and qualities of many products was to manufacture a batch of those products and get them out to market, which was costly. However, the ability to launch it from a digital standpoint allows you to accomplish things that scale much more cheaply.

What about a quick return on investment?

Experts are divided on whether these virtual worlds will generate actual money for businesses in the near future. Certainly, money is being invested in sites such as Roblox. The virtual world reported $517.7 million in sales in its most recent financial report, a 2% increase year over year. According to a McKinsey projection from June, the metaverse might have a $5 trillion influence by 2030. According to the paper, the metaverse would have a market impact of $2 trillion to $2.6 trillion on e-commerce. In addition, Citi projected in March that the addressable market for the metaverse may be worth between $8 trillion and $13 trillion by 2030.

Can brands, however, get more rapid benefits on their investments?

At the moment, experts see it as an area to learn and experiment, where businesses may focus on capturing the attention of new audiences. Only in exceptional instances can the brand realize a monetizable return on investment.

Not all Roblox brands choose to offer their own virtual items. When looking for other companies that have participated in the sector, such as Nike or Gap, the top results are goods produced and sold by individual producers rather than the brands themselves. Whether or whether money can be made from the metaverse now or in the future, many people feel that the concept itself has staying power, regardless of how it turns out.

Even if the hype cycle in the metaverse appears to have finished, firms are probably as involved and dedicated today as they have been in the past six months, and this is likely to continue. The fact is that these technologies will drastically alter our lives. This is not going away. Some individuals believed that the internet was merely a hype cycle. And the metaverse will have a similar influence.


The advent of cryptocurrency welcomed chaos in the world of finance. Thanks to the lack of regulations and decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies, the industry was filled with ambiguity which resulted in various financial crimes across the globe. However, the free rein of cryptocurrency is now coming to an end. The credit goes to Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

With the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) finalizing the cross-border reporting framework for crypto assets, sources in the know say that various countries are now considering finalizing the dimensions of its regulations including India. India’s G20 chairmanship beginning in December 2022 has boosted the country’s cryptocurrency industry. India’s Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, as well as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), have already emphasized the significance of a worldwide framework for crypto regulation. The crypto sector believes that India’s G20 chairmanship will give a chance to further that cause. In response to a request from the G20 finance leaders, the OECD created a framework this week for the automated exchange of information between nations on crypto assets.

The new transparency project was established in collaboration with G20 countries, and it comes amid increased adoption of the usage of crypto assets for a wide range of investment and financial purposes, despite recent market instability dampening crypto investing significantly over the last year. Unlike traditional financial goods, crypto-assets may be transferred and stored without the interference of traditional financial intermediaries such as banks, and without any central administrator having complete knowledge on either transactions or crypto-asset holdings, according to the OECD. The cryptocurrency market has also fueled the growth of new intermediaries and service providers, such as crypto-asset exchanges and wallet providers, many of which are still unregulated.

The report also defined crypto assets. Crypto assets “includes assets that can be held and transferred in a decentralised manner, without the intervention of traditional financial intermediaries, including Stablecoins, derivatives issued in the form of crypto assets, and certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs)”.

In conclusion, the OECD Regulations mean the arrival of a more strong and comprehensive regulation related to the crypto sector in India. 

Beware Of Forex Scam

As the industry lacks a global regulatory authority, scammers find ways to exploit market
players by looking out for loopholes in the Forex industry” – Adv. P.M. Mishra, Finjuris Counsel FZ-LLC UAE

Regrettably, fraud exists in all commercial spheres, including the Forex market. Even in 2022, unscrupulous Forex brokers continue to defraud unwary traders. Brokers that engage in forex scams are not usually represented by the brokers themselves. They are most frequently individual players who do not have businesses but present themselves as brokers. They are frequently experienced Internet users capable of fabricating misleading information on the site they developed.

The proprietors of such scam sites lack a license and hence are not adequately controlled. Sometimes they don’t even understand the basics of the Forex market. However, not everything is clear to a beginner trader who has not studied economics or finance. There are three types of Forex scam that end up blacklisting brokers. They are:

  • Brokers on the run: Until recently, this was the most common type of fraud. A site is created by a group of individuals (or even one person). Often, it is only a landing page that encourages people to invest and make a lot of money. PAMM accounts may also be included. Scammers don’t care what they say, what matters is that they lure individuals and their money. As a result, they may collect deposits from traders and close the site, declare a pre-planned insolvency, or make no disclosures at all.
  • Pyramid Schemes: This is maybe the most well-known sort of fraud that is utilized everywhere, not only in the foreign exchange industry. This sort of fraud has nothing to do with Forex brokers. It is about the firm posing as a broker while, in fact, it just takes deposits from traders, frequently without even seeming to be active on the interbank market. They just keep making bogus promises and chanting slogans. This form of fraud is becoming less widespread than others.
  • Forex Bucket Stores: This form of scam is more polished and takes more meticulous planning, but the scammer’s potential payoff is also greater. In this situation, they build a full-fledged platform that mimics the features of top Forex brokers. The trader does not compete on the global interbank market, but rather with other traders who are only registered on their fake website, or perhaps with the platform itself. Naturally, Forex bucket shops establish unrealistic conditions in order for the site to remain profitable while traders continue to lose money.
  • Robot Scams: An old and new fraud manifests itself in some sorts of forex-developed trading systems. These con artists boast about their system’s capacity to create automated transactions that earn large sums of money even while you sleep. Because the procedure is now entirely mechanized using computers, the new phrase is “robot.” In any case, many of these systems have never been submitted for official review or evaluated by a third party.

Therefore, it is very important for investors to run a due-diligence on their brokers to ensure they are legitimate. Many improvements have drove out the crooks and old schemes, while also legitimizing the system for the many legitimate businesses. However, be aware of new forex scams; the draw and temptation of enormous earnings will always attract more and more adept fraudsters to this market.